Close Menu
San Joaquin Messenger
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Regional
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Weather
What's Hot

Explore the Stunning Botanical Gardens of California’s Sierra Nevada Region

March 5, 2026

Essential Insights on CEQA Review for JSX Approvals

March 5, 2026

Reviving Glory: Forest Lake Christian Triumphs in NorCal Quarterfinals

March 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
San Joaquin Messenger
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Regional
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Weather
San Joaquin Messenger
Home»Business»Monterey Park Residents Stand Against AI Data Center Plans
Business

Monterey Park Residents Stand Against AI Data Center Plans

By March 5, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Concerns Mount Over Proposed AI Data Center in Monterey Park

Monterey Park, CA — The Monterey Park City Council is currently evaluating a controversial proposal for an artificial intelligence (AI) data center that has raised serious concerns among local residents. This facility, intended to be built on 1977 Saturn Street, covers an area equivalent to four football fields and is designed to support advanced generative AI technologies.

Important Information About the AI Data Center

  • Location: 1977 Saturn Street, Monterey Park
  • Size: Approximately four football fields
  • Community Concerns: Rising electricity bills, increased water demand, and potential environmental effects
  • Current Status: A temporary moratorium has been approved as the council considers a November ballot measure
  • Developer Commitment: The developer has agreed to prepare a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to address community concerns

Local Residents Voice Their Concerns

The area that the proposed data center would occupy currently hosts largely vacant office buildings, with an estimated vacancy rate of 86%. Many residents, including local advocate Jeremy Fisher, have expressed anxiety over the implications of the project. Fisher recently unveiled a 3D-printed model illustrating the site’s proximity to surrounding homes, emphasizing that it would be located very close to thousands of residences.

“The impact on the community could be substantial,” he noted, reflecting a widespread fear of increased noise, energy consumption, and other unknown factors. His remarks resonate with the sentiments of numerous neighbors who have begun posting signs stating “No Data Center in Monterey Park” across their properties.

City Council Response

In light of extensive public opposition expressed during city council meetings, officials voted to explore the possibility of placing a ballot measure before voters and enacted a temporary moratorium to scrutinize available options. Councilmember Vinh Ngo highlighted the clear stance of the community: “The sentiment is no data center at this point,” he remarked.

A pivotal city council meeting on March 4 may determine whether the question will go to a vote in November, allowing residents to weigh in on the future of the data center.

The Broader Context of AI and Energy Consumption

This debate in Monterey Park is reflective of a wider national conversation regarding the rapid expansion of the AI industry and its resource demands. Dr. Nick Rabb, a computer and cognitive science expert at California State University, Los Angeles, points out that generative AI systems require significantly more computing power compared to traditional technology. “One interaction with a service like ChatGPT consumes five times the electricity of a Google search,” he stated.

A recent report from Goldman Sachs predicts that electricity costs surged nearly 7% last year, with data centers expected to account for 40% of electricity demand growth by the end of the decade. In water-scarce areas like Southern California, the concerns extend beyond energy consumption.

“Data centers can consume tens of thousands of gallons of water, taking from a limited resource,” cautioned Rabb.

Developer’s Commitment to Address Concerns

The proposal is being put forth by DigiCo REIT, an investment backed by HMC Capital, based in Australia. In response to community feedback, DigiCo has pledged to conduct an Environmental Impact Report to assess the project’s implications on local resources and the environment.

In a statement, the company indicated that the increased scrutiny around energy and water usage has delayed the approval process.

Future Considerations

For concerned residents like Fisher, the core issue revolves around responsible development, especially within residential areas. “We need to pause and consider the implications of such projects on our communities,” he emphasized.

As discussions continue, Monterey Park faces a critical question shared by communities nationwide: how to harness the benefits of artificial intelligence without compromising local resources or quality of life.

For more information on community initiatives, you can visit Monterey Park’s official website.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

California’s Landmark Enforcement Spurs Increased Privacy Protections

March 4, 2026

Folsom Student Shines at National Business Awards

March 4, 2026

New Draft CA High-Speed Rail Business Plan Offers Lower Costs than Previous Version

March 4, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Explore the Stunning Botanical Gardens of California’s Sierra Nevada Region

By March 5, 2026

Discover the Hidden Gem: Woodlake Botanical Garden in California Explore the Beauty of California’s Sierra…

Essential Insights on CEQA Review for JSX Approvals

March 5, 2026

Reviving Glory: Forest Lake Christian Triumphs in NorCal Quarterfinals

March 5, 2026
Top Trending

Steve Ding Interview on Affordability

By sanjoaquinmessengerFebruary 26, 2026

Steve Ding: For me affordability means people can pay the bills, raise a family, and plan for the future without being one emergency away from losing their home or business.

Beyond the “Affordability” Buzzword: What San Joaquin County Actually Needs

By sanjoaquinmessengerFebruary 26, 2026

For working families in San Joaquin County, the affordability crisis is painfully real. The median home now costs $545,000—requiring an annual income of $137,200 to purchase.

California SBDC 2025 Small Business Success Highlights

By February 26, 2026

California Small Business Development Center Network Boosts Small Business Growth in 2025…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers.

Advertisement
Demo
About

Welcome to San Joaquin Messenger, your trusted source for the latest news, updates, and stories from across California. Our mission is simple: to keep residents, visitors, and anyone interested in California well-informed with accurate, timely, and engaging journalism.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Trending This Week

Steve Ding Interview on Affordability

February 26, 2026

Beyond the “Affordability” Buzzword: What San Joaquin County Actually Needs

February 26, 2026

California SBDC 2025 Small Business Success Highlights

February 26, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 SJM website Favicon. All Rights Reserved.
Paid for by Ding for Supervisor 2026.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.