Iranian-Americans Celebrate War with Iran in Tehrangeles
On the night of February 28, Westwood Boulevard transformed into a scene of jubilation as Iranian-Americans celebrated the onset of military conflict with Iran—not with protests, but with exuberant festivities. The gathering in Los Angeles—affectionately dubbed Tehrangeles—saw community members dancing and waving the historic red, white, and green Lion and Sun flag of pre-revolutionary Iran alongside American and Israeli flags. Chants for a free and secular Iran echoed through the streets, marking a significant emotional moment for the community, reminiscent of pivotal historical junctions since the 1979 revolution.
The Context of California’s Iranian Community
California is home to nearly 500,000 Iranians, accounting for about half of the Iranian population in the United States. The majority immigrated or were raised by immigrants who fled the Islamic Republic’s oppressive regime. These individuals include former teachers, entrepreneurs, political dissidents, and religious minorities who faced persecution and persecution. Their unified narrative emphasizes a profound reality: they are here today because the Iranian regime made life unbearable back home.
Emotional Ties to Military Action
For the Iranian-American community, the question of whether to support military actions against the Iranian regime transcends foreign policy; it is intensely personal. The predominant sentiment has been positive, advocating for intervention if it means escaping another 47 years of tyranny under the current regime.
Gratitude Towards American Leadership
In this festive atmosphere, gratitude directed toward former President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was palpable. Many in Westwood proudly displayed signs proclaiming, “Thank You Trump for Freeing Iran,” reflecting years of disillusionment with Democratic administrations that engaged in diplomatic negotiations with what many in this community regard as an irredeemably criminal regime.
Discontent with the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has lingered, viewed not as pragmatism but as appeasement. Recent attempts by the Biden administration to revive the agreement met with skepticism, leading many to regard the airstrikes initiated by Trump as a beacon of hope—a liberating narrative for the Iranian people.
Diverse Perspectives within the Community
The Iranian-American community is not monolithic. It includes Iranian Jews, who have personal histories tied to their expulsion after the 1979 revolution, as well as Muslims and secular Iranians who view Israel as a mutual ally against theocratic tyranny. The unity in this complex community arises from a shared desire for a future free from the current regime’s oppression.
Navigating the Complexities of War
While the enthusiasm for military action is evident, many community members harbor worries about the ramifications of prolonged conflict. This concern is particularly acute for those with family and friends still in Iran. Despite their anxiety, it does not equate to opposition against military intervention. The current regime poses a significant threat, evident in its ongoing human rights violations and nuclear ambitions.
There’s a collective understanding of the risks involved, taking lessons from historical precedents such as the aftermath of the Iraq War. The desire is not for chaos, but rather for a transitional government that paves the way toward democracy.
Support for Reza Pahlavi
In discussions about Iran’s future leadership, former Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi emerges as a favored figure to lead a potential transitional government. Living in the United States since the revolution that ousted his father, Pahlavi has positioned himself not as a monarch striving for restoration but as a stabilizing presence who could facilitate a democratic transition through referendums and free elections.
The community’s backing of Pahlavi is rooted in a collective vision for a secular, democratic Iran. They believe his role could be pivotal in a peaceful transition, serving as a bridge to a better future.
Political Ramifications in California
In congressional districts encompassing Westwood and several affluent areas, representatives predominantly belong to the Democratic Party. Since the outbreak of the conflict, these representatives have been cautious, acknowledging the regime’s brutality while criticizing unauthorized military strikes. This hesitation has disheartened many Iranian-Americans, who feel that their interests are not being adequately represented.
Although some in the community may have differing political beliefs, the consensus is clear: most favor military action and are disappointed by the Democratic leadership’s response. This realization reinforces a growing sentiment that the Democratic Party does not fully represent their core interests.
A Unique Relationship with Warfare
The Iranian diaspora’s connection to the conflict is distinctive, driven by a nuanced hope. They are not simply pro-war individuals; they are people who fled oppression and still harbor dreams of a liberated homeland. The hope for a free Iran persists—a sentiment that continues to shape their identities and aspirations.
As the conflict unfolds, the Iranian-American community remains vigilant, united by their shared history and unwavering belief in a brighter future for Iran.
