Close Menu
San Joaquin Messenger
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Regional
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Weather
What's Hot

Interview with Steve Ding on Fighting Fraud and Keeping Government Costs Under Control

May 13, 2026

San Joaquin County Update: Ghost Candidate: The New Dem Tactic

May 11, 2026

County Government Is Coming to Lodi

May 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
San Joaquin Messenger
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Regional
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Weather
San Joaquin Messenger
Home»Business»Live Nation Backs California Bills for Affordable Tickets: A Trustworthy Move?
Business

Live Nation Backs California Bills for Affordable Tickets: A Trustworthy Move?

By April 19, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Live Nation Backs California Bills for Affordable Tickets: A Trustworthy
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

California Lawmakers Address Ticket Resale Market Amid High Prices

California lawmakers are taking action in response to the troubling trends in the ticket resale market, where exorbitant prices for popular concert tickets have become the norm. Recent headlines highlighting Bruno Mars tickets selling for up to $2,000 and SZA tickets skyrocketing to $600 have prompted legislative proposals aimed at protecting consumers and regulating ticket prices.

Alarmingly High Ticket Prices

Earlier this year, tickets for SZA’s performance at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles were available at $35 but quickly surged to $600 just a day before they officially hit the market. In a similar scenario, tickets to see Sam Smith at the Castro Theater in San Francisco had an initial sale price of $120 but were resold for over $600 by scalpers.

These inflated prices have raised concerns among legislators, leading them to propose two bills aimed at overhauling the ticketing landscape. One bill aims to cap resale prices, preventing resellers from marking up tickets excessively, while the other seeks to prohibit the sale of tickets that resellers do not actually own at the time of listing.

Legislative Proposals: Protecting Consumers or Strengthening Monopolies?

Assemblymembers Issac Bryan from Culver City and Matt Haney from San Francisco are at the forefront of these legislative efforts. They argue that their proposals are focused on consumer protection. Interestingly, both bills have garnered support from Live Nation, the parent company of Ticketmaster, prompting concerns that these measures might inadvertently strengthen the company’s monopoly in the ticketing industry.

Recently, a federal jury found Live Nation had illegally acted as a monopoly, leading to ongoing legal challenges and scrutiny regarding its business practices. As the company awaits penalties, the proposed bills are still advancing through the California legislative process.

Divergent Opinions on Proposed Bills

Supporters, including various artists and independent venues, advocate for the legislation, asserting that it addresses pressing consumer issues. However, critics, including ticket resale competitors, express concern that the bills could limit consumer choice and reinforce Ticketmaster’s dominance in the market. For instance, Jose Barrera, the national vice president of the League of United Latin American Citizens, argues that these bills could enable a monopoly that fails to prioritize consumer interests.

Jack Sterne, a spokesperson from StubHub, commented on the legislation, warning against empowering Ticketmaster at the expense of competitive alternatives. Meanwhile, supporters assert that the bills serve to regulate the marketplace effectively, reducing price gouging and ensuring that tickets sold are legitimate.

Key Proposals: Assembly Bill 1349 and Assembly Bill 1720

Assembly Bill 1349 aims to ban the sale of speculative tickets—those that are not in the possession of the seller. Bryan emphasized that this bill is essential for protecting fans from excessive markup and predatory practices prevalent in the current market.

On the other hand, Assembly Bill 1720, known as the California Fans First Act, seeks to institute a 10% cap on ticket resale prices, including fees. Haney argues that scalpers have been exploiting both artists and fans, making it difficult for Californians to afford tickets for live events. He dismisses claims that this bill would aid Ticketmaster’s monopoly.

Controversial Market Dynamics

Opponents of the bills, like Diana Moss, vice president of the Progressive Policy Institute, criticize price caps as detrimental to market health, calling them “anti-consumer” and “anti-competitive.” According to her, restricting resale market prices might channel consumers back to Ticketmaster, which has been criticized for its high fees and subpar service.

Despite the controversies and significant lobbying efforts on both sides, these bills have made progress in California’s Assembly committees, signaling a potential shift in how live event tickets are sold and resold.

For fans and artists alike, these legislative efforts may reshape their experiences in the live performance landscape, aiming to create a fairer system in which concertgoers can access events without the burden of inflated resale prices.


Learn more about ticket resale laws and their implications on your concert-going experiences.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Kiani’s Severance Dispute Moves to California

April 22, 2026

Sable Offshore’s Government Ally

April 21, 2026

California Accuses Amazon of Forcing Price Hikes on Businesses

April 21, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Interview with Steve Ding on Fighting Fraud and Keeping Government Costs Under Control

By sanjoaquinmessengerMay 13, 2026

We sat down with Supervisor Steve Ding at his district office to talk about a subject that doesn’t always make headlines but affects every taxpayer in the county: fraud, waste, and the relentless work of keeping government accountable.

San Joaquin County Update: Ghost Candidate: The New Dem Tactic

May 11, 2026

County Government Is Coming to Lodi

May 9, 2026
Top Trending

California Tightens Rules on Montana Luxury Car Tax Evasion

By April 3, 2026

California Targets Wealthy Residents: Crackdown on Luxury Vehicle Tax Evasion The “Montana…

Interview with Steve Ding on Fighting Fraud and Keeping Government Costs Under Control

By sanjoaquinmessengerMay 13, 2026

We sat down with Supervisor Steve Ding at his district office to talk about a subject that doesn’t always make headlines but affects every taxpayer in the county: fraud, waste, and the relentless work of keeping government accountable.

San Joaquin County Update: Ghost Candidate: The New Dem Tactic

By sanjoaquinmessengerMay 11, 2026

POOF! A new Democrat is running for County Supervisor in San Joaquin County. Who is he/she/it? What is he/she/it?

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers.

Advertisement
Demo
About

Welcome to San Joaquin Messenger, your trusted source for the latest news, updates, and stories from across California. Our mission is simple: to keep residents, visitors, and anyone interested in California well-informed with accurate, timely, and engaging journalism.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Trending This Week

California Tightens Rules on Montana Luxury Car Tax Evasion

April 3, 2026

Interview with Steve Ding on Fighting Fraud and Keeping Government Costs Under Control

May 13, 2026

San Joaquin County Update: Ghost Candidate: The New Dem Tactic

May 11, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 SJM website Favicon. All Rights Reserved.
Paid for by Ding for Supervisor 2026.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.